Criminology Term: Concur

When it comes to legal proceedings, the term 'concur' can often stir up some confusion. But fear not, for this complex concept is sure to leave you scratching your head in wonder!

Let us delve deeper into the world of appellate courts to fully comprehend the intricacies of concurring.

To put it simply, concurring occurs when an appellate court agrees with a decision made by a lower court or another court. This is especially relevant when a defendant appeals their conviction to a higher court. The appellate court may then review the case and either affirm or reverse the lower court's decision. If they decide to agree with the lower court's decision, a concurring opinion is issued.

This opinion means that the judges on the appellate court are in agreement with the lower court's decision and the legal reasoning behind it.

Alternatively, a dissenting opinion may be issued if the appellate court does not agree with the lower court's decision. This indicates that the judges on the appellate court are not in agreement with the legal reasoning and outcome of the lower court's decision.

But why is this important, you ask? Concurring opinions and dissenting opinions serve as important legal precedents that can influence future court decisions.

These opinions can shape the interpretation of laws and help ensure that justice is served in an impartial and consistent manner.